Skip to content

1,000-Star quarterly health-review template

Copy this template into a dated evidence document. Replace every placeholder; do not delete an unanswered field. The review is a decision record, not a marketing update.

Review identity

Field Value
Review window YYYY-MM-DD through YYYY-MM-DD
Captured at YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ
Current phase G0–G9
Source revision full 40-character public or explicitly local-only Git SHA
Reviewer role or approved public identity
Decision ADVANCE, HOLD, REPLAN, or SUSTAIN
Next review YYYY-MM-DD

Outcome summary

In five sentences or fewer, state what became easier, what remains unsafe or unproven, and why the selected decision follows from the evidence.

Phase exits

Required exit Status Evidence Blocker / next action
replace with every exit for the current phase PASS, FAIL, or INCOMPLETE repository-relative path or public URL exact condition and owner

No phase advances with a missing row or an INCOMPLETE quality exit. A Star checkpoint is reported separately and cannot turn an exit into PASS.

Funnel scorecard

Stage Current value Prior comparable value Interpretation
Stars — — lagging discovery signal
14-day qualified referrals — — top-referrer limitation stated
Primary bundle downloads — — release and age stated
Independent first maps — — accepted cumulative / attempted window
First-run completion and active time — — sample size and workflow stated
External PRs / merged contributors — — 90-day / 180-day windows
Untriaged issues and response time — — support scope stated
Stable release age — — exception, if any, stated
Review-owner coverage — — named domain, not only a count

Use privacy-bounded aggregates. Do not include stargazer, issue-author, validator, or contributor identities without a separate reason and consent.

Product and evidence health

Check Status Evidence / finding
Supported P0/P1 queue — —
Clean install and upgrade — —
Canonical first-map path — —
Release rollback/recovery — —
Public claim reproduction — —
Dependency and license drift — —
Private/local-only critical input — —

Capacity and ownership

Signal State
Product/community/research allocation —
Product WIP —
Community WIP —
Research WIP —
Contributions awaiting substantive review —
Single-owner procedure or subsystem —
Support load exception —

State which scope will be reduced if capacity is insufficient. Do not reduce a quality gate to fit the quarter.

Experiment decisions

Previous experiment Baseline Result Decision and reason
one row per active experiment — — CONTINUE, STOP, or REDIRECT

Largest current constraint

Name exactly one constraint in the discovery → activation → trust → contribution → sustainability chain. Include the evidence that makes it larger than the alternatives.

Next bounded portfolio

Slice Outcome Owner Stop condition Due/review date
Product/release one outcome — — —
Community one outcome — — —
Research zero or one outcome — — —

External-action state

Gate State Exact authorized scope or blocker
E1 source publication AUTHORIZED or NOT_AUTHORIZED —
E2 artifact publication AUTHORIZED or NOT_AUTHORIZED —
E3 community mutation AUTHORIZED or NOT_AUTHORIZED —
E4 stable release AUTHORIZED or NOT_AUTHORIZED —

Authorization for one row must not be copied into another.

Final decision

Record ADVANCE, HOLD, REPLAN, or SUSTAIN, the evidence-based reason, the next review date, and the person or role responsible for the next bounded outcome.