Skip to content

Wrong surfaces can have low and ambiguous photometric costs

Frozen 1812d061, evaluated2026-10-30. See protocol, plan, all18 diagnoses and depth strata and schema.

Wrong-normal regions more often have ambiguous image appearance, but the fixed photometric probes do not cleanly separate correct and incorrect surfaces. In 11/18 frames, the wrong-normal group's median base photometric cost is LOWER than the agreeing group's. Small left/right image difference cannot be used as a correctness certificate for the reconstructed surface.

Per-frame pooled-depth statistic, median across18 frames Normal agrees Normal disagrees
Competing disparity within .5gray units of base 32.48% 44.56%
Alternative better by >1gray unit 2.27% 3.95%
Patch texture standard deviation <=5 45.29% 48.38%

Wrong-group ambiguity exceeds agreeing-group ambiguity in13/18 frames; the alternative-better rate exceeds it in15/18, and low-texture rate in10/18. These associations do not establish a calibrated confidence threshold or causal effect. Depth distributions, surface type and visibility differ between labeled groups; per-depth-band counts/statistics are retained rather than treating pooled medians as depth-controlled evidence. Sparse far-depth strata limit inference there.

The three persistent failures

Frame Agreeing median image cost Wrong-normal median cost Agreeing ambiguity Wrong-normal ambiguity
0005/frame38 2.6720 2.2096 29.79% 40.61%
0005/frame114 3.2288 .9456 28.61% 53.29%
0009/frame111 3.4496 1.4720 34.16% 52.69%

Values are zero-mean5x5 mean absolute gray differences, NOT SGBM's regularized cost. In frame114, wrong-normal patches have median texture std3.03 versus6.58 for agreeing patches. At frame111 it is5.43 versus7.23. Matching a nearly uniform region can yield low residual under multiple disparities. These local probes cannot identify which disparity is physically correct or whether stereo, LiDAR normals, reference/time assumptions or occlusion cause each wrong surface label.

Scope and verification

Exactly121636 frozen selected-grid samples were considered;120010 have common valid photometric support across all nine offset probes. Base disparity>8px and remap/border constraints deliberately remove some far/border samples. No claim covers excluded points. Original raw SGBM correspondences, not smoothed-plane disparity, are probed. The source depth bands use original stereo optical z; normal labels come from frozen offline LiDAR/reference maps only after selection.

All18 recomputed restored SGBM arrays reproduce the archive exactly. Four focused tests, repository Ruff and strict documentation build pass. Checks validate schema, source/input hashes,18-case completion, positive/common-candidate support and explicit empty groups. Tests cover an exact known image shift, flat-patch ambiguity and the map population denominators. No cost-selected depth, new mask, optimizer, production default or calibration verdict changes. No SOTA claim.

Development decision

Close the current stereo-surface confidence/filter branch. Its successive local, reverse and temporal consistency tests cannot certify all18 frames, and the new appearance probes show that low cost itself is not a sufficient replacement. Do not tune SGBM or choose gray/texture thresholds using these labeled outcomes. Keep the existing full-cloud MI6/12 as the real-data baseline.

The next materially different direction is a review of direct cross-modal RGB–LiDAR correspondence providers beyond the already rejected SuperGlue/I2PNet exports. Before execution compare architecture, reproducible checkpoints, license/isolation, training overlap and CPU/GPU availability, then select one feasible, explicitly frozen spent-data pilot with geometric-support and pose-recovery accounting. Do not consume fresh holdouts, repeat the rejected provider's threshold sweep or claim a new provider works merely because runtime is available. If no compatible candidate is feasible, state the resource/evidence prerequisite instead of continuing these local confidence variants.