# Unveiling the Black Box: Independent Functional Module Evaluation for Bird's-Eye-View Perception Model

> **Draft note**: This page was auto-generated from the ICRA 2025 paper list abstract and public arXiv/OpenAlex metadata. Human review is still needed.

| Item | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Session | Autonomous Vehicle Perception 4 |
| arXiv | [http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11969](http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11969) |
| Authors | Zhang, Ludan, Ding, Xiaokang, Dai, Yuqi, He, Lei, Li, Keqiang |
| Source | ICRA 2025 / arXiv |

## TL;DR

- End-to-end models are emerging as the mainstream in autonomous driving perception.
- Pioneering in the issue, we present the Independent Functional Module Evaluation for Bird’s-Eye-View Perception Model (BEV-IFME), a novel framework that juxtaposes the module's feature maps against Ground Truth within a unified semantic Representation Space to quantify their similarity, thereby assessing the training maturity of individual functional modules.
- However, the inability to meticulously deconstruct their internal mechanisms results in diminished development efficacy and impedes the establishment of trust.

## Task

* Perception
* Calibration
* Intelligent Vehicles

## Keywords

* Computer Vision for Automation / Deep Learning Methods / Representation Learning

## AI依存度

* Hybrid

## 何を解決？

* End-to-end models are emerging as the mainstream in autonomous driving perception.

## 何が新しい？

* Pioneering in the issue, we present the Independent Functional Module Evaluation for Bird’s-Eye-View Perception Model (BEV-IFME), a novel framework that juxtaposes the module's feature maps against Ground Truth within a unified semantic Representation Space to quantify their similarity, thereby assessing the training maturity of individual functional modules.

## どうやってる？

* The core of the framework lies in the process of feature map encoding and representation aligning, facilitated by our proposed two-stage Alignment AutoEncoder, which ensures the preservation of salient information and the consistency of feature structure.

## どこが強い？

* However, the inability to meticulously deconstruct their internal mechanisms results in diminished development efficacy and impedes the establishment of trust.

## 弱そうなところ

* 学習データ依存性と、古典部分との寄与分解は本文・ablation を確認したい。

## 関連研究との違い

* 既存手法との差分は abstract だけでは粒度不足。比較設定を本文で確認したい。

## non-AIとして見る価値

* 学習要素はあるが、どこまでが古典手法でどこからが学習依存かを切り分けて読む価値がある。

## 難易度

★★（abstract 初見ベース）

## 自分の理解/感想

* 初見では、学習と古典手法の分担がどこで効いているかを見極めたい。