# BETTY Dataset: A Multi-Modal Dataset for Full-Stack Autonomy

> **Draft note**: This page was auto-generated from the ICRA 2025 paper list abstract and public arXiv/OpenAlex metadata. Human review is still needed.

| Item | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Session | Autonomous Vehicle Navigation 2 |
| arXiv | [http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07266](http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07266) |
| Authors | Nye, Micah, Raji, Ayoub, Saba, Andrew, Erlich, Eidan, Exley, Robert, Goyal, Aragya, Matros, Alexander, Misra, Ritesh, Sivaprakasam, Matthew, Marko, Bertogna, Ramanan, Deva, Scherer, Sebastian |
| Source | ICRA 2025 / arXiv |

## TL;DR

- We present the BETTY dataset, a large-scale, multi-modal dataset collected on several autonomous racing vehicles, targeting supervised and self-supervised state estimation, dynamics modeling, motion forecasting, perception, and more.
- Existing large-scale datasets, especially autonomous vehicle datasets, focus primarily on supervised perception, planning, and motion forecasting tasks.
- Our work enables multi-modal, data-driven methods by including all sensor inputs and the outputs from the software stack, along with semantic metadata and ground truth information.

## Task

* GNSS Fusion
* Perception
* Motion Planning
* State Estimation

## Keywords

* Autonomous Vehicle Navigation / Data Sets for Robot Learning / Dynamics

## AI依存度

* Hybrid

## 何を解決？

* We present the BETTY dataset, a large-scale, multi-modal dataset collected on several autonomous racing vehicles, targeting supervised and self-supervised state estimation, dynamics modeling, motion forecasting, perception, and more.

## 何が新しい？

* We present the BETTY dataset, a large-scale, multi-modal dataset collected on several autonomous racing vehicles, targeting supervised and self-supervised state estimation, dynamics modeling, motion forecasting, perception, and more.

## どうやってる？

* 手法詳細は本文確認前のため、現時点では abstract 由来の把握に留まる。

## どこが強い？

* 評価条件や比較対象の強さは本文確認が必要。

## 弱そうなところ

* 学習データ依存性と、古典部分との寄与分解は本文・ablation を確認したい。

## 関連研究との違い

* 既存手法との差分は abstract だけでは粒度不足。比較設定を本文で確認したい。

## non-AIとして見る価値

* 学習要素はあるが、どこまでが古典手法でどこからが学習依存かを切り分けて読む価値がある。

## 難易度

★★★（abstract 初見ベース）

## 自分の理解/感想

* 初見では、学習と古典手法の分担がどこで効いているかを見極めたい。